From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 2 02:41:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630C160D for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 02:41:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7052ED1 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 02:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 097EF56088; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 21:41:47 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 21:41:47 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Bryan Drewery Subject: Re: sysutils/fusefs-kmod needs a poke Message-ID: <20131002024147.GB28855@lonesome.com> References: <20130930211343.D5EB920360@smtp.hushmail.com> <5249FCEC.5050805@FreeBSD.org> <20130930224641.BD5BA20360@smtp.hushmail.com> <524A02D1.60105@FreeBSD.org> <20131001005813.57AD020361@smtp.hushmail.com> <20131001213825.GD66839@admin.xzibition.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131001213825.GD66839@admin.xzibition.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Kenta Suzumoto , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" , William Grzybowski X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 02:41:49 -0000 On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:05:52PM -0300, William Grzybowski wrote: > Hi, > > Due to the bureaucracy involved its always best if you file a pr > (send-pr(1)) reporting the issue. Unless a portmgr steps in to fix the > problem. It may seem like bureaucracy to folks, but it's a deliberately chosen compromise between stepping on the toes of people who are temporarily busy, and getting work done promptly. It's the best we have right now. In the meantime, if anyone wants to look at the list of unmaintained ports to help maintain some, as usual it is available at: http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portsconcordanceformaintainer.py?maintainer=ports%40FreeBSD.org fwiw, Number of ports with no maintainer: 4285 (17.6%), so the page will take a while to load. mcl