From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Mar 13 00:20:04 1996 Return-Path: owner-bugs Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id AAA12448 for bugs-outgoing; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 00:20:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id AAA12430 Wed, 13 Mar 1996 00:20:02 -0800 (PST) Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 00:20:02 -0800 (PST) Resent-Message-Id: <199603130820.AAA12430@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: gnats (GNATS Management) Resent-To: freebsd-bugs Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats@freefall.FreeBSD.org, muir@idiom.com Received: from idiom.com (idiom.com [140.174.82.4]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA11851 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 00:12:32 -0800 (PST) Received: (from muir@localhost) by idiom.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id AAA05830; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 00:12:25 -0800 Message-Id: <199603130812.AAA05830@idiom.com> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 00:12:25 -0800 From: David Muir Sharnoff Reply-To: muir@idiom.com To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2 Subject: bin/1077: ipfw command doesn't work on 2.1-STABLE Sender: owner-bugs@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Number: 1077 >Category: bin >Synopsis: ipfw command doesn't work on 2.1-STABLE >Confidential: no >Severity: critical >Priority: high >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Wed Mar 13 00:20:01 PST 1996 >Last-Modified: >Originator: David Muir Sharnoff >Organization: Idiom Consulting >Release: FreeBSD 2.1-STABLE i386 >Environment: >Description: Perhaps I messed up on some step... I sup'ed over a cvs tree. I checked out the RELENG_2_1_0 tag. I built a kernel... I installed it on my test system. No network. Looked at ipfw. Compiled /sbin/ipfw. Installed it. No dice: it says "missing action". The command I'm giving: ipfw add 32000 accept all from any to any I've tried reasonable alternatives. The version of ipfw.c that I have is 1.15.4.2. Is that what I should be using? If not, what's the right tag for 2.1-STABLE? >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: I think the default deny rule should be something that people have to compile in if they want it. It's too destructive for novices and the unwary. It's a good thing I read many of the freebsd mailing lists 'cuase if I didn't I wouldn't have thought to go look at ipfw. >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: