From owner-freebsd-isdn Sat Dec 23 7:23:11 2000 From owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 23 07:23:10 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Received: from hcshh.hcs.de (hcshh.hcs.de [194.123.40.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A00A37B400 for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2000 07:23:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from hcswork.hcs.de (hcswork.hcs.de [192.76.124.5]) by hcshh.hcs.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BABA35D1E; Sat, 23 Dec 2000 16:22:39 +0100 (CET) Received: by hcswork.hcs.de (Postfix, from userid 200) id 707302B7; Sat, 23 Dec 2000 16:31:29 +0100 (MET) Subject: Re: remote ip In-Reply-To: <20001223105929.B253@speedy.gsinet> "from Gerhard Sittig at Dec 23, 2000 10:59:29 am" To: Gerhard Sittig Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 16:31:29 +0100 (MET) Cc: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Reply-To: hm@hcs.de Organization: HCS Hanseatischer Computerservice GmbH X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL84 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20001223153129.707302B7@hcswork.hcs.de> From: hm@hcs.de (Hellmuth Michaelis) Sender: owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org From the keyboard of Gerhard Sittig: > confused it with what I have here -- since I could never imagine > why I should do PPP in kernel space. PPP in kernel is small and limited in its capabilities (and the packets stay in the kernel) and userland PPP is great and does all and everything. I use both and both have their good sides and their drawbacks. hellmuth -- Hellmuth Michaelis Tel +49 40 55 97 47-70 HCS Hanseatischer Computerservice GmbH Fax +49 40 55 97 47-77 Oldesloer Strasse 97-99 Mail hm [at] hcs.de D-22457 Hamburg WWW http://www.hcs.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message