From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Feb 2 09:51:15 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA27013 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 2 Feb 1997 09:51:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA26998 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 1997 09:51:08 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id SAA24031; Sun, 2 Feb 1997 18:50:33 +0100 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.8.5/8.6.9) id SAA02125; Sun, 2 Feb 1997 18:33:59 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 2 Feb 1997 18:33:59 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: nadav@cs.technion.ac.il (Nadav Eiron) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CMD640b flaw workaround References: <199702021530.QAA00202@helbig.informatik.ba-stuttgart.de> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.55-PL10 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: ; from Nadav Eiron on Feb 2, 1997 18:23:54 +0200 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Nadav Eiron wrote: > Cool! Will this work under 2.1.6R (yeah, I know, but it's a "production" > machine, and while we are working on an upgrade to SCSI, it currently has > a CMD640)? If you run a ``production machine'' with a broken disk interface chipset, you don't need to worry running GAMMA quality software on it (FreeBSD 2.2) either. :-] I think your chipset is way more broken than FreeBSD 2.2 is. ;) -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)