Date: Sat, 31 May 1997 13:23:46 -0500 From: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> To: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-current@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ctm Message-ID: <l0310280bafb61bd557f9@[208.2.87.4]> In-Reply-To: <l03020902afb5beb3f221@[194.32.164.2]> References: <199705301253.OAA04727@sliphost37.uni-trier.de> <199705300624.IAA03466@sos.freebsd.dk> <Pine.BSF.3.91.970529234559.364C-100000@Journey2.mat.net> <199705300624.IAA03466@sos.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 6:49 AM -0500 5/31/97, Bob Bishop wrote: >>14 amicus-networks.Dallas.mci.net (204.70.147.70) 207 ms * 211 ms >>15 10.1.1.3 (10.1.1.3) 230 ms 187 ms 187 ms > >Eeek! Noone should be advertising a route to 10.x.x.x (see RFC1918). Try >shouting at mci.net Who says that they are advertising a route to 10.x.x.x? The advertised route is to 208.2.87.x Traceroute is getting identification of intermediate routers which happen to be on a private network. They cannot be addressed from the outside. I do not believe that this violates RFC1918.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?l0310280bafb61bd557f9>