From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 12 09:26:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EC716A4CE for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:26:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out001.verizon.net (out001pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE9743D53 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:26:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from reso3w83@verizon.net) Received: from ringworm.mechee.com ([4.26.84.7]) by out001.verizon.net ESMTP <20050212092647.ZHJM29541.out001.verizon.net@ringworm.mechee.com>; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:26:47 -0600 Received: by ringworm.mechee.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8BEF92CE740; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 01:22:34 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: Sander Vesik Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 01:22:33 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <1935025570.20050211232605@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502120122.33589.reso3w83@verizon.net> X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out001.verizon.net from [4.26.84.7] at Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:26:46 -0600 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:26:48 -0000 On Saturday 12 February 2005 12:58 am, Sander Vesik wrote: > On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:26:05 +0100, Anthony Atkielski > > wrote: > > Julio Capote writes: > > > A website like www.spreadfirefox.com aims at targetting firefox > > > to regular users that may not get the full "marketing dosage" > > > from www.mozilla.org, so why not do the same for freebsd? > > > > Because FreeBSD is a server, not a desktop. The real market > > potential is on the server side. And if you want to convince large > > organizations to adopt FreeBSD as a server, you must not present it > > as a substitute for Windows desktops, a/k/a "regular users." > > This is BULLSHIT. Not just any any bullshit either but virulent > stinky bullshit - and also coincidentially the best way to dispromote > FreeBSD. > > > -- > > Anthony I Agree! My FreeBSD desktop is very stable and user friendly. What ever time I spend fixing/managing desktops is on my friends windows machines, never my own because it always just works. To be fair though Xorg and KDE deserve some credit credit for this as well. -Mike