From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Apr 30 01:00:20 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA13259 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 01:00:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from helbig.informatik.ba-stuttgart.de (helbig.informatik.ba-stuttgart.de [141.31.166.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA13252 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 01:00:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from helbig@localhost) by helbig.informatik.ba-stuttgart.de (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA09876; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 09:57:30 +0200 (MET DST) From: Wolfgang Helbig Message-Id: <199704300757.JAA09876@helbig.informatik.ba-stuttgart.de> Subject: Re: Postscript on a bubblejet In-Reply-To: from Anthony Hill at "Apr 30, 97 04:47:48 pm" To: ahill@interconnect.com.au (Anthony Hill) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 09:57:29 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL30 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > I'm about to purchase a printer - it needs to be cheap, and I need to be > able to print postscript. I belive something pretty workable can be done > using ghostscript as a filter talking to non-postscript printers. > > So the question is - has anyone used either the HP Deskjet 400 or the > Cannon BJC-210 with ghostscript with acceptable results ? I am using Canon BJ-200ex without any trouble, the quality of the postscript output looks good. (at least to me) BTW I've found the apsfilter port *very* useful. Wolfgang