Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 11:30:14 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <TrimYourCc@NUXI.com> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NO MORE '-BETA' Message-ID: <20010316113014.D93551@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20010316091602N.jkh@osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@osd.bsdi.com on Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 09:16:02AM -0800 References: <20010315180837.N29888@fw.wintelcom.net> <20010315194029C.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> <20010315201500.A2484@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20010316091602N.jkh@osd.bsdi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 09:16:02AM -0800, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> 2. The usage of BETA in newvers.sh
>
> I think it's #2 which is actually causing all the problems here and I
> would happily forgo changing newvers.sh until it's time for the actual
> release. I don't usually mark it BETA myself, but one of my helpers
> here jumped the gun this time. :)
It is needed for -ports. *MANY* ports break when uname starts reporting
a minor version greater than the existing one.
So we are back to needing a new name. Would "4.3-PRE-RELEASE" make people
happy?
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010316113014.D93551>