From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 8 12:25:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E20116A420 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2006 12:25:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from mh2.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [207.200.51.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0530443D49 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2006 12:25:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from [10.177.171.220] (neutrino.centtech.com [10.177.171.220]) by mh2.centtech.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k18CPHNw090982; Wed, 8 Feb 2006 06:25:17 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Message-ID: <43E9E32D.6090605@centtech.com> Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 06:25:17 -0600 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christian Baer References: <20060208075825.GA11037@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1280/Tue Feb 7 04:11:53 2006 on mh2.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GELI -> What to encrypt? X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 12:25:18 -0000 Christian Baer wrote: > On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 08:58:25 +0100 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > > >> GELI, just like GBDE or any other GEOM class can work on _any_ GEOM >> provider (disk, slice, partition, mirror, etc.). >> > > Actually, I knew that it *could* work on any provider. I did read the > manpage. :-) What I wanted to know is where I *should* make it work on. > Basicly speaking, I'm not sure if I like the idea of the partition table > being encrypted too because the risk of losing data seems to be higher > this way. Or am I just paranoid? > Why would the risk of losing data be higher? Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't. ------------------------------------------------------------------------