From owner-cvs-ports Sun Feb 16 23:42:27 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA29416 for cvs-ports-outgoing; Sun, 16 Feb 1997 23:42:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.ucdavis.edu [128.120.37.176]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA29411; Sun, 16 Feb 1997 23:42:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (reqf-064.ucdavis.edu [128.120.253.184]) by relay.nuxi.com (8.8.4/8.6.12) with ESMTP id XAA05224; Sun, 16 Feb 1997 23:42:39 -0800 (PST) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) id HAA22585; Mon, 17 Feb 1997 07:42:17 GMT Message-ID: <19970216234216.PB64256@dragon.nuxi.com> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 1997 23:42:16 -0800 From: obrien@NUXI.com (David O'Brien) To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Cc: pst@shockwave.com, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/gcc/config/i386 freebsd-elf.h freebsd.h References: <199702170734.SAA20018@godzilla.zeta.org.au> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.60_p2-3,5,8-9 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Disclaimer: Mutt Bites! Organization: The NUXI *BSD group X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 In-Reply-To: <199702170734.SAA20018@godzilla.zeta.org.au>; from Bruce Evans on Feb 17, 1997 18:34:14 +1100 Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > >Ok, then how about "__post_44bsd__". > > Nope. Most 4.4 BSD systems won't have it, so you still may as well spell > it `__FreeBSD__'. I can work on that one. :-) I've gotten the feeling OpenBSD (please no tomatoes) seems willing to do some things to be able to use our ports collection. Working on one at a time, and we might be able to get the others... > >Yes, but people simply don't do that. If anybody can offer a guarenteed > >way to include w/o needing to defined something like > >HAVE_SYS_PARAM_H in the Makefile, I'll switch all ports over to that. > > There is no better way. Define in in bsd.port.mk so at least the makefiles > don't need it. That may not be a bad idea. I'm guessing I would meet with resistance to also add this to /etc/make.conf ? -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org)