From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 5 05:19:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11991065672; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 05:19:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: from z.umatar.com (z.umatar.com [66.135.39.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667968FC14; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 05:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from z.umatar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q655Jiwd077268; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 22:19:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: (from uzimac@localhost) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q655Jhd5077267; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 22:19:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) X-Authentication-Warning: z.umatar.com: uzimac set sender to uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com using -f From: "Waitman Gobble" To: Baptiste Daroussin Message-Id: <1341465583.77262@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Originating-IP: 75.36.149.244 X-Mailer: Usermin 1.500 Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 22:19:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1341465583" Cc: Sayetsky Anton , FreeBSD Current , "Hartmann, O." , bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why NOT using FreeBSD? Re: ports/169581: editors/libreoffice: X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 05:19:50 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1341465583 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Baptiste Daroussin wrote .. > On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:59:03AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > > On 07/02/12 08:09, Sayetsky Anton wrote: > > > I will test libreoffice build on 8.3-RELEASE today or tomorrow. > > > I have both gstreamer and boost installed now. > > > > > > > > > We use FreeBSD 9.0STABLE and FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT (both amd64). > > > > devel/boost-lib gets reeled in now by editors/libreoffice by default, so > > it doesn't need to be installed explicitely. > > > > I saw a patch flushed in yesterday, submitted by bapt@. This patch also > > installs LLVM/CLANG from the ports - with ASSERTS deactivated. > > > > I have on both systems, FreeBSD 9 and 10, LLVM/CLANG 3.1 as the standard > > backend compiler, I guess this version has the suspected ASSERTS activated. > > > > Why another LLVM port? We already have LLVM/CLANG in the base system (9 > > and 19). If the ASSERTS proble is the cause for breaks reported on the > > list and elsewhere on the net, why isn't the maintainer still stuck on > > the "old" version? > > > > I just managed it to install the prior version on broken systems and was > > really lucky having LibreOffice working again. But the other day I was > > bothered by the next non-working version and now I have lots of > > notebooks remaining with NO LibreOffice on FBSD 9-STABLE. > > > > This is not what I expect from quality securing! It is simply a mess and > > definitely another reason and point for the thread "Why NOT using FreeBSD". > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > sure libreoffice is so easy to port... > > /me officially gives up with that libreoffice port, open for new volunteers > > bapt LibreOffice is pretty massive. I've spent much of the day working on building 3.6.0.0 on 10-CURRENT with gcc48 and openjdk6. I have been using AbiWord but the word-wrap is crazy. Try writing a novel with weird word breaks and moving paragraphs and it's driving me koo-koo pants. Also it does not appear to do right-left opposing margins. I was interested in building AbiWord dev on my machine but the dev team seems very MS-centric, much of a chore using their HEAD. Gnumeric works great, I have successfully interoperated, no urgent issues. on to LibreOffice... I can create and submit a port for libreoffice 3.6.0.0 if anyone is interested in trying the "beta" version. Might take a few days. Still working on it. At the moment, there is one small change to configure.in. It stubbornly demands libclucene-core instead of libclucene. Most of the libraries are built from ports, then using --with-system-foo in autogen.sh -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA --bound1341465583--