From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 27 06:26:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9775F16A416 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 06:26:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay1.wplus.net (relay1.wplus.net [195.131.52.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C3243D5C for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 06:26:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from desktop.home.serebryakov.spb.ru ([89.163.10.141]) by relay1.wplus.net (8.13.6/8.13.1/RELAY-DVD) with ESMTP id k9R6QiAo038751 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:26:49 +0400 (MSD) Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:26:47 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.11.02) Organization: FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <917908193.20061027102647@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: current@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lev Serebryakov List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 06:26:51 -0000 Hello , I've was sure, that both libpthread and libthr use KSE to make multithreading. They use KSE in different ways: libpthread uses N:M model and libthr uses 1:1 model, but bot use KSE to work. How will be possible to sue these libraries (read: multithreaded programs) when KSE will be optional, on kernel without KSE?! -- Best regards, Lev mailto:lev@FreeBSD.org