From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Feb 10 18:59:45 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA03716
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 10 Feb 1996 18:59:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from dima@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA03710
          Sat, 10 Feb 1996 18:59:43 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199602110259.SAA03710@freefall.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Kerberos @ freebsd.org?
To: mark@grondar.za (Mark Murray)
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 18:59:43 -0800 (PST)
Cc: dima@FreeBSD.ORG, imp@village.org, ache@astral.msk.su, current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199602100744.JAA27983@grumble.grondar.za> from "Mark Murray" at Feb 10, 96 09:44:50 am
From: dima@FreeBSD.ORG (Dima Ruban)
X-Class: Fast
Organization: HackerDome
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

Mark Murray writes:
> 
> > > We're running the Cygnus Kerberos, so I can't comment on ebones.
> > > Looks like the same stuff...
> > 
> > Is eBones compatible with KerberosIV? I mean, I have kerberos on 
> > some of my computers, and I've heard encryption (or something else) isn't
> > compatible beetween kerberos and ebones. So, basically the question is:
> > will I be able to use eBones/kerberos encryption if I go from
> > kerberos machine to eBones server?
> 
> A couple of years ago when Geoff Rehmet and others ported Kerberos/eBones
> it was tested against a known good Kerberos system.
> 
> I suppose now is the time to see if it still good. The DES library
> used in freeBSD has been around for a while and is well respected,
> even to the extent of being used in Kerberos5. (This is Eric Young's
> DES library.)

let's try it ...

> 
> M
> --
> Mark Murray
> 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa
> +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200
> Finger mark@grondar.za for PGP key
> 

-- dima