From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 7 19:26:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF3316A422 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 19:26:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B43D43D58 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 19:26:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7961A4E66; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 11:26:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B3158517BC; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 14:26:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 14:26:06 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com Message-ID: <20060307192606.GA56153@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060307184210.GA33347@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060307190712.68220.qmail@web32713.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AhhlLboLdkugWU4S" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060307190712.68220.qmail@web32713.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: amd64 and -fPIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:26:12 -0000 --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 08:07:12PM +0100, pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com wrote: >=20 > --- Kris Kennaway ha scritto:=20 >=20 > ... > > >=20 > > > That doesn't solve the problem, which is: the static library is > > > almost useless, and users might actually want or need to use the > > > static library. > >=20 > > Why do you say it's useless? The point of a static library is for > > static linking, and this works fine on amd64 or any other > > architecture. > >=20 >=20 > The problem is mixing static and shared libraries: this is perfectly legal Unjustified assertion. > and > very often desired in most platforms except on amd64 and other modern arc= hitectures. Kris --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEDd5OWry0BWjoQKURAlydAJ4ys6yovSBvaGOg3nkddEN+5xT68ACfTGJN JoL31Ab3onSvEcSy6kl+SyU= =/cOZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S--