From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 16 11:33:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D8616A4DF for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:33:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcbdyndns@bellsouth.net) Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1681A43D70 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:33:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rcbdyndns@bellsouth.net) Received: from ibm65aec.bellsouth.net ([66.21.215.79]) by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060816113353.VQXI17236.imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm65aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 07:33:53 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.102] (really [66.21.215.79]) by ibm65aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060816113352.QKRC27941.ibm65aec.bellsouth.net@[192.168.0.102]> for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 07:33:52 -0400 Message-ID: <44E3029F.9080506@bellsouth.net> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 06:33:51 -0500 From: B Briggs User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060729) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: devel/fam build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:33:54 -0000 Stanislav Sedov wrote: > --Sig_WbNhFI1NVPDTKUJcczy/9wv > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:55:35 -0500 > B Briggs mentioned:r > >> Anyway, I have a question: Why are there two ports here that do the same= > =20 >> thing? Some of my ports specify fam, some specify gamin, and of course I= > =20 >> have to have the WITH_FAM_SYSTEM var in make.conf to remove conflicts.=20 >> If the two DON'T do the same thing, what is the difference? Just asking. >> =20 > > They are merely two different implementations of FAM subsystem: one > from SGI, another from RedHat. I belive, that SGI's one is sligthly > faster currently. Also, it covers standard completely contradictory to > gamin. > > If you have the same problem, can you please provide a list of > installed packages and error log? > > I tested it on 4.x and 7.x with all ports up-to-date and there is no > such problem. > I've included errors and lists of packages in another post. Just to let you know, I changed the Makefile on line 19 BACK to what it was before it was changed on August 13: -USE_AUTOTOOLS= aclocal:19 automake:19 autoconf:259 libtool:15 +USE_AUTOTOOLS= automake:15 autoconf:253 There is an error message, but it WILL build completely. I didn't try to install because I have no clue about automake stuff and don't trust what I did to get it to build. Just thought I'd let you know. Also, I'm running gamin until this gets fixed. Here's the only error that I see (couple of warnings later on but I don't think they're critical): bbriggs# make ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> Extracting for fam-2.6.10 => MD5 Checksum OK for fam/fam-2.6.10.tar.gz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for fam/fam-2.6.10.tar.gz. ===> Patching for fam-2.6.10 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for fam-2.6.10 ===> fam-2.6.10 depends on executable in : gmake - found ===> fam-2.6.10 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/automake15 - found ===> fam-2.6.10 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf253 - found ===> Configuring for fam-2.6.10 configure.in: 834: required file `./_AM_File,.in' not found configure.in: 834: required file `./$2,.in' not found configure.in: 834: required file `./$3)].in' not found checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel Another thing that I tried was changing your configure.in script to the non-deprecated form of AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE section 5.6.1 here: http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Public-macros but I get the same error message: > configure.in:37: your implementation of AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE comes from an > configure.in:37: old Automake version. You should recreate aclocal.m4 > configure.in:37: with aclocal and run automake again. > *** Error code 63 Hope this helps. -- B Briggs