From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 2 13:55:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B28316A41F for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 13:55:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: from isis.sigpipe.cz (fw.sigpipe.cz [62.245.70.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9683743D45 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 13:55:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: by isis.sigpipe.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 96A9A1F87BEF; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 15:54:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 15:54:59 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: robert@webtent.com Message-ID: <20050902135459.GB18540@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mail-Followup-To: robert@webtent.com, Paul Schmehl , FreeBSD Ports References: <1125403722.10883.5.camel@columbus> <1125665001.22694.11.camel@columbus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1125665001.22694.11.camel@columbus> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Paul Schmehl , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: broken getopt X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 13:55:03 -0000 # lists@webtent.net / 2005-09-02 08:43:21 -0400: > On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 23:36 -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: > > --On Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:08 AM -0400 Robert Fitzpatrick > > wrote: > > >> If you really must link Postfix with libraries that slurp-up GNU getopt, > > >> "fix" the definition of GETOPT() in sys/util/sys_defs.h. Perhaps there > > >> should be a CCARGS override for this... > > >> > > > > > > I'll have to say I have no idea what these guys are talking about on the > > > Postfix list, it must be some port I've installed that has linked in a > > > way they suggest. I have not done anything except install very common > > > ports on this FreeBSD mail server with no special linking or compile > > > options, etc. All ran smooth until the latest portupgrade of Postfix and > > > other related packages - amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, etc. Can someone > > > here perhaps suggest how I might track down this problem? > > > > > make rmconfig, then run install again - this time don't select SPF. That > > should solve your problem. The problem isn't with gnu getopt. It's with > > SPF. > > So, I cannot use the SPF support? I have two customers on this transport > server that use SPF records. Also, this is a production server and I > need to be sure of my process for re-install. I assume by what you're > saying above, I should run 'make rmconfig' to remove configurations and > then re-install on top of what's there, or does rmconfig do more? > Actually it looks like there is another version ready in the port system > one minor higher than mine, can't I just run portupgrade and don't > select SPF? And if I do that, should I still run rmconfig? Thanks for > the help. The rmconfig target (and related ones) is described in ports(7). -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991