From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 1 14:05:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23115B75 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 14:05:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00978FC0A for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 14:05:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.135.101] (c-71-202-26-251.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.202.26.251]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.feral.com (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA1E5VAp096070 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Nov 2012 07:05:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Message-ID: <509281A6.1050302@feral.com> Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 07:05:26 -0700 From: Matthew Jacob Organization: Feral Software User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joerg Pulz Subject: Re: isp(4) broken in RELENG_9 References: <50915CC0.1090207@feral.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]); Thu, 01 Nov 2012 07:05:32 -0700 (PDT) Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matt Jacob List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:05:34 -0000 So, it's working in 9.1 but not in 9? Since any fix to 9.0 would be in 9.1 are we just concerned with understanding what happened, or is there a specific reason we need to know what changed so that a specific fix to 9.0 is needed? I'm sure that there is a bug in isp where it can ask for more than a page's worth of queue space mapping but can't deal with things if you get more than 1 segment descriptor back. I need to fix that, but I won't be able to get to that for a couple of weeks. It's possible that the FC-TAPE changes triggered this because that threw more of a load on the control space. I'll try and calculate a change to MAXISPREQUEST to re-fit within a page some time today. -matt