From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jul 30 16:39: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (mta02-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E30237B401 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 16:38:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from greid@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sobek.lan ([62.252.12.173]) by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20010730233857.WYNT29790.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@sobek.lan>; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 00:38:57 +0100 Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 00:38:52 +0100 (BST) From: George Reid X-X-Sender: To: John Merryweather Cooper Cc: Subject: Re: ports/29332: Refiling New Port: ripem-2.1 In-Reply-To: <20010730163008.E82760@johncoop> Message-ID: <20010731003558.F55343-100000@sobek.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, John Merryweather Cooper wrote: > I was told to refile it. No, that was the reason Dima gave for setting the Reponsible: field to freebsd-ports instead of gnats-admin (GNATS sometimes trashes PRs and they need to be manually refiled by a committer). It wasn't a request for you to send another PR. > The SHAR archive refers to itself. Yes, in both PRs; I will close the first one. -- +-------------------+---------------------+ | George Reid | FreeBSD Committer | | +44 7740 197460 | greid@FreeBSD.org | +-------------------+---------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message