Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 10:38:34 -0400 From: "Christopher J. Umina" <chris@uminac.com> To: Olivier Nicole <olivier.nicole@cs.ait.ac.th> Cc: Bill Tillman <btillman99@yahoo.com>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: X client without X server Message-ID: <CAJxEW_wyqGQUVaBw_QZTq%2BVvm1%2BMZZ0sXJkiH7ZTO6J1Vf%2BdwA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2Bg%2BBvi%2Bcs=TFFkp5Vxxu-PmuNqqv0exZQ-MpbOZttF4UyOT4A@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA%2Bg%2BBvggCPtF-AMSc_PanaPtBAD2K_TRDgQzdtTrbd-M43QLKw@mail.gmail.com> <201307031317.r63DHQqR034336@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <1372865169.34030.YahooMailNeo@web165004.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <CA%2Bg%2BBvi%2Bcs=TFFkp5Vxxu-PmuNqqv0exZQ-MpbOZttF4UyOT4A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
You can remove leaf ports using pkg_cutleaves once everything is installed. You can even remove pkg_cutleaves with pkg_cutleaves if you don't want it anymore. On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Olivier Nicole <olivier.nicole@cs.ait.ac.th> wrote: > Hi, > >> Just my 2=A2 worth on this. Sure, one always wants to keep overhead low.= But >> the days of limited RAM, small hard drives, etc...are long since behind = us. > > My concern is when portupgrade -a. The more ports on the system, the > more likely the upgrade will fail. So I'd prefer to have as little > unused ports as possible. > > Not to mention that security wise, having unused ports sitting there > is not too good. > > Best regards, > > Olivier > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" --=20 Christopher J. Umina chris@uminac.com 781 354 0535
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJxEW_wyqGQUVaBw_QZTq%2BVvm1%2BMZZ0sXJkiH7ZTO6J1Vf%2BdwA>