From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon May 8 0:20:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE9537C033 for ; Mon, 8 May 2000 00:20:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id AAA99933; Mon, 8 May 2000 00:20:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 00:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200005080720.AAA99933@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Sheldon Hearn Subject: Re: kern/18394: When /swap if full ? Reply-To: Sheldon Hearn Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/18394; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sheldon Hearn To: Gregory Bond Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/18394: When /swap if full ? Date: Mon, 08 May 2000 09:12:31 +0200 On Mon, 08 May 2000 10:09:26 +1000, Gregory Bond wrote: > > $yes 'yes' > > Hmm, if it were > $yes `yes` > (nb: back-tic not apostrophe) then this would run out of swap space... > eventually. In which case, a simple `yes` would suffice. Note that it's the shell that exhausts memory, not the yes process. So now the the originator needs to tell us whether this is still a problem when he uses login.conf(5) resource limits properly. I still think this is bogus. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message