From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Apr 14 00:08:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F2BB0F312 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 00:08:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-f176.google.com (mail-io0-f176.google.com [209.85.223.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B038C17A1 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 00:08:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 2so88525020ioy.1 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 17:08:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=5nNgnjb1kXrm2hoswlFbW5vagtcM9J3en448vzEgQ2c=; b=SAaznHpX7gvAdJpgSJNSzOj/EHY/MkJ3f8M3X3M4RF0v7DHFzKfIjr0BypUc3ngkmJ 290bmsaqa4igDoWW2C0YCpP7eFsNmuyLIYJDkIfZ1b7dN44OjfFLovoKFi+fNLgYe93X fFK7HDhzjVIysrlQ//WGFnQMLPracgbtfABakMejYt8b6uBEJPwOvKRg918bOp94pVmT z7i2j3IVRrGN/m1L2PHyLfiP5GZRGqifScQsKZSy7A9nveZnCwRPIC1eqGOAQKupYUEM mMv+MLNLi+f6eqGzbRLDkMqOgFU4tFpX2rL8yM/4lrG59pSsdIbWnBeV47N0Pgg2+etX tjLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FULmUS8rQrXAzoN2AX5IOyWsYq8v1hpflsfAXA2IXZPV/1I3RUMIcAHgbCGa7xP+A== X-Received: by 10.107.133.233 with SMTP id p102mr13648875ioi.1.1460592507444; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 17:08:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WorkBox.Home.gmail.com (75-161-218-198.mpls.qwest.net. [75.161.218.198]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id eb1sm1861425igc.3.2016.04.13.17.08.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Apr 2016 17:08:26 -0700 (PDT) References: <3qlNxw33PhzRRqR@baobab.bilink.it> <3qlQxr34YhzRRqQ@baobab.bilink.it> <86h9f5ax8e.fsf@WorkBox.Home> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 24.5.1 From: Brandon J. Wandersee To: Luciano Mannucci Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS with errors In-reply-to: <86h9f5ax8e.fsf@WorkBox.Home> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 19:08:26 -0500 Message-ID: <86fuupaw79.fsf@WorkBox.Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 00:08:33 -0000 Brandon J. Wandersee writes: > Even a one-disk ZFS stripe with the "copies" > property raised is probably better than a large, multi-disk stripe. ...though I should add that a stripe of two completely identical disks (make, model, size), while still vulnerable, will perform better than one disk. ;) -- :: Brandon J. Wandersee :: brandon.wandersee@gmail.com :: -------------------------------------------------- :: 'The best design is as little design as possible.' :: --- Dieter Rams ----------------------------------