Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 15:19:13 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio Message-ID: <20010531151913.A59786@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010531134600.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Thu, May 31, 2001 at 01:46:00PM -0700 References: <20010531130155.A58258@dragon.nuxi.com> <XFMail.010531134600.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 01:46:00PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > It doesn't hurt to help distribute the load some, though. Requiring > each person who makes a change to compile it on every possible arch is > not something that will scale as more and more archs are added. It isn't that hard to put the bits on Freefall and test on all arches. Especially for a _KERNEL_ patch that touches this many files -- some Alpha specific. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010531151913.A59786>