From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 21 23:40:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBAAB37B401 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 23:40:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-115-75-1.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.115.75.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107E343F93 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 23:40:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A7966D74; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 23:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 893791536; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 23:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 23:40:14 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Edwin Groothuis Message-ID: <20030422064014.GA62078@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <003b01c307f5$8c936e00$0480763e@semhome> <1050982709.421032.879.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru> <20030422062152.GA18011@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <20030422063428.GM808@k7.mavetju> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030422063428.GM808@k7.mavetju> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade & RO ports tree (was Re: [kris@freebsd.org: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.port.mk]) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 06:40:16 -0000 --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 04:34:28PM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 08:21:52AM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 07:38:29AM +0400, "."@babolo.ru wrote: > > > > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > > > Hm, execuse me my sarcasm, but do we really need the second portu= pgrade > > > > > in C??? > > > >=20 > > > > I see two main reasons: > > > > 1) portupgrade is not in base system and never be there because of = ruby. > > > > 2) Because it is in ruby :) > > > 3) Because it do not works on RO mounted /usr/ports > >=20 > > It does. I have always run it in such a setup. >=20 > No, it should. And ports which fail to build because of this should > be fixed to use the WRKDIRPREFIX variable. >=20 > Kris, can we have a run of the ports-package system with a RO > /usr/ports to see which ports fail because of this? It always has, and none of them do :) Kris --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+pOPOWry0BWjoQKURAudgAKDWUzirR0GihAykNXu6Fto8dVU28wCffaWw X56PV6pNzpDqkZ9yt2Wd0D4= =dtLO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--