From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 24 14:49:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB8B8392 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:49:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cosmo.uchicago.edu (cosmo.uchicago.edu [128.135.52.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95AD9141E for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:49:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by cosmo.uchicago.edu (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9EC61CB8C9D; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:49:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 128.135.70.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user valeri) by cosmo.uchicago.edu with HTTP; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:49:32 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <14591.128.135.70.2.1429886972.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: <20150424123823.1f02c665@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <65468.128.135.70.2.1429815636.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <20150424123823.1f02c665@gumby.homeunix.com> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:49:32 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: ufs snapshot help From: "Valeri Galtsev" To: "RW" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Reply-To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:49:33 -0000 On Fri, April 24, 2015 6:38 am, RW wrote: > On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:00:36 -0500 (CDT) > Valeri Galtsev wrote: > >> > >> Once (a while ago) I noticed Linuxes have started in addition to /tmp >> using /var/tmp, > > FreeBSD has always had /var/tmp. It's perfectly sensible, file > in /tmp don't need to survive a reboot, those in /var/tmp do. Functionality wise, yes. Security/robustness wise, no. Well, one can have both by creation of yet another partition and mounting it as /var/tmp. Then regular user will not be able to just fill up /var (through /var/tmp) thus stopping logs being incremented, preventing daemons being started (the ones that need to write their PID into /var/run) etc. Valeri > >> and yet even worse /usr/tmp. What a brain dead >> decision! It always is regretful when one sees "Linuxisms" creeping >> in into better systems like FreeBSD ;-( > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++