Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:33:55 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd vs. linux Message-ID: <793369596.20050212123355@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <420DE485.7040308@locolomo.org> References: <200502112313.28082.hindrich@worldchat.com> <420DE485.7040308@locolomo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Erik Norgaard writes: > You can find countless comparisons suporting either as superior - just > the recent mysql benchmark supports linux/gentoo. I've worked on benchmarks in the past. Most of them are worthless. > I think FreeBSD boosts administrator performance. I spend less time > maitaining my systems and resolving dependencies or debugging, than I > did on RedHat, Debian or Gentoo. > > That time is precious, this is where you can save on the IT budget, so > using FreeBSD is a good investment. I agree. These days, I have to depend on my operating systems; I cannot afford to play around with them for hours, days, or weeks at a time. On the production system, every minute of downtime is money lost. So I need something simple and reliable. FreeBSD has proven itself to be in this category, so I run FreeBSD. -- Anthony
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?793369596.20050212123355>