From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep  9 08:39:15 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96D1B10656DC
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu,  9 Sep 2010 08:39:15 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de)
Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5922A8FC15
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu,  9 Sep 2010 08:39:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad
	(HSI-KBW-078-042-098-160.hsi3.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de
	[78.42.98.160])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902568A267C
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu,  9 Sep 2010 10:39:13 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4C889D30.9040500@bsdforen.de>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:39:12 +0200
From: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-GB;
	rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100908 Thunderbird/3.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: test builds for which architectures
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:39:15 -0000

Back in July a discussion on this list convinced me that it
would be useful to run my own tinderbox and provide logs together
with my ports PRs and once the thing has started working for me,
look at other PRs and run test builds for them, too.

Now, after an embarrassingly long time, the box is finally up and
running, the first test builds have been quite satisfying.

So now that the thing works I scrapped all the tinderbox jails to
create a more thought through setup.

Now I wonder, which builds should I provide? Will RELENG_8 and
RELENG_7 amd64/i386 builds suffice or should I also provide logs
for the 7.3 and 8.1 releases?

Regards

-- 
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?