From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb  2 07:48:53 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FBB316A420;
	Thu,  2 Feb 2006 07:48:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6F043D48;
	Thu,  2 Feb 2006 07:48:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58D520AE;
	Thu,  2 Feb 2006 08:48:47 +0100 (CET)
X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO
X-Spam-Learn: ham
X-Spam-Score: -3.1/3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tim.des.no
Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180])
	by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5536020AC;
	Thu,  2 Feb 2006 08:48:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 413D733C22; Thu,  2 Feb 2006 08:48:47 +0100 (CET)
To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
References: <20060201165326.6E44E7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca>
	<20060201180223.O52964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
	<43E0F41C.5020907@samsco.org>
From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=)
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:48:47 +0100
In-Reply-To: <43E0F41C.5020907@samsco.org> (Scott Long's message of "Wed, 01
	Feb 2006 10:47:08 -0700")
Message-ID: <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	Harti Brandt <harti@FreeBSD.org>, sparc64@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc <freebsd-sparc64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-sparc64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 07:48:53 -0000

Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> writes:
> I've been trying to reproduce this on my local hardware, but I can't
> trigger it.

The ISP driver abuses the inline keyword.  As I told mjacob earlier,
the extensive inlining not only breaks the build, but probably hurts
performance as well.

(what gcc is complaining about, specifically, is that expanding calls
to inlined functions causes isp_target_notify() to grow by more than
100%)

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no