From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Sep 4 17:40:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B2337B440 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2000 17:40:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id RAA90297; Mon, 4 Sep 2000 17:40:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 17:40:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200009050040.RAA90297@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Ville Eerola Subject: Re: ports/20716: [PATCH] update port: mail/fetchmail to 5.5.0 Reply-To: Ville Eerola Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/20716; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ville Eerola To: Peter Pentchev Cc: Maxim Sobolev , freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/20716: [PATCH] update port: mail/fetchmail to 5.5.0 Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 03:37:34 +0300 (EEST) Peter Pentchev writes: > Yup, you're correct :) 5.5.1 is out, and the only code change is exactly > this bugfix - all the other changes are in the language files. > > Attached is a trivial checksum-and-distfile Makefile patch :) Now, it looks a lot better ;-) Just like so many other fetchmail upgrades... > Normally I'd be reluctant to recommend (and even to trust..) a > non-gold fetchmail release - I have been bitten by fetchmail > instabilities in the past - but seeing as the only change is really > this bugfix, it seems safe to skip a gold version in this case :) Right. Now, we just need to get someone to commit this update. :-) Regards, Ville -- Ville Eerola | Powered by ve@sci.fi | FreeBSD To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message