Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 13:03:49 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Shane Ambler <BSD@shaneware.biz>, freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: building legacy packages with poudriere ? Message-ID: <5481F385.9070304@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <54816BC8.8070909@ShaneWare.Biz> References: <5480A3CC.4050701@sentex.net> <5481018A.6050607@FreeBSD.org> <548112EC.5020404@sentex.net> <54816BC8.8070909@ShaneWare.Biz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/5/2014 3:24 AM, Shane Ambler wrote: > > default method is portsnap - pkg_install is an svn branch name > > poudriere ports -m svn+https -B pkg_install -c > > > If that fails you could manually checkout with svn and use > > poudriere ports -c -p pkg_install -F -f none -M /path/to Thanks! I had to blow away the default as it was from head, and poudriere kept saying I already had a default. How does one typically maintain distinct ports trees on the same box, or do they bother to ? Anyways, at this point I achieved what I wanted to do (build a python package), so my immediate need is solved! Next is to integrate poudriere into future projects. Thanks everyone for the help! ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5481F385.9070304>