From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 6 13:59:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A6BA460 for ; Tue, 6 May 2014 13:59:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from owm.eumx.net (eumx.net [91.82.101.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03EFD21D for ; Tue, 6 May 2014 13:59:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=eumx.net; h=date:from:to :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=default; bh=S5KVKSg3amH1OQqeykSfHjT26S0=; b=nY3F FgH6bsDHLrV7R4/e4BklBAacREuhr9kdAt8fEQbMypSJUzaEpkA2n7xovqiGLH1m PASGjDcLhl+RMFARvgJsC7WJ80sZKFmuX3vOB5S6B5lq5gZjeF23jOj8Ebt4y3Rd puAR+sKGNPUUj5SkfAIOs4UatU4dG32aeyz01Xg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=eumx.net; h=date:from:to :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=p4XLw5W7YVMNhNdB7XIEQlXQUMovr2 TZFdZDRilsZkmKTr9SBreYZRM6NdqYvZo2X/5pM9aKsVloXuWIOYLIWrYreN4ctq 0lFDoHzxXiM6POANv2H9GBsEZIR4bFkUTz8Z0KdpK1F6CwoeefQ995Zrg6L0N8o2 uLmU89WmQde8M= Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 15:30:27 +0200 From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting VNET/VIMAGE across the finish line Message-ID: <20140506133027.GA99254@oslo.ath.cx> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22.1 (2013-10-16) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 13:59:21 -0000 On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 06:56:12PM -0700, Kevin Bowling wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to see VNET/VIMAGE get added to GENERIC in -CURRENT and help stamp > out any remaining issues. > > I'm aware of two broad problems at the moment: > * http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=164763&cat= > * pf related things which seem to be getting addressed > > Is anyone tracking other issues? I just stumpled upon this problem: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/2013-April/002200.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64/2011-October/014050.html -- Herbert