From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 1 15:51:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3EC416A422 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 15:51:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from mv.twc.weather.com (mv.twc.weather.com [65.212.71.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162A543D75 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 15:51:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from [10.50.41.234] (Not Verified[10.50.41.234]) by mv.twc.weather.com with NetIQ MailMarshal (v6, 0, 3, 8) id ; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:08:19 -0500 From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 10:30:05 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511011030.06028.jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Victor Snezhko Subject: Re: CURRENT + amd64 + user-ppp = panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 15:51:30 -0000 On Monday 31 October 2005 11:53 pm, Victor Snezhko wrote: > Sorry for breaking the thread, I don't have message-id for message I'm > replying to (neither a mailman interface, mor mailing list browser > don't provide ids for recent messages). > > John Baldwin wrote on Mon Oct 31 08:43:20 PST 2005: > > > A bit further. > > > > > > On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Vladimir Kushnir wrote: > > > > OK, here it is. It's happened between 2005.10.21.19.42.50 and > > > > 2005.10.22.05.07.00. > > > > Since then, panic is absolutely reproducible. > > > > > > Actually, when I took INET6 from kernel (once again, it's GENERIC) > > > these panics stop. > > > > Hmmm. Are those timestamps UTC? If so, there's nothing worthwhile that > > changed in there: > > I experience the same problem, just wanted to report - when I > cvsupped to the kernel as of 2005.10.21.19.42.50, problem remained. > > nooption INET6 actually helps. What about 2005.10.21.16.00.00? Does that fail or break? -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org