From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 24 20:35:59 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F85F343
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 20:35:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22a.google.com (mail-ig0-x22a.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22a])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F79192B
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 20:35:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ig0-f170.google.com with SMTP id a13so7563486igq.1
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 13:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=uR4VPbfBxPG+CtPYjcYU28V8/tViCULoTC1HbmAi5uk=;
 b=REiYTTrM1JPP+OBrjODSkopZkRDr1ifSAVnVXFP6w6i0w3CE2l6qmu4M5cZnullxfA
 H3SsFls8SW4CuHuUZWwgLkLvbFnEPtvwH2/sdxfvkevhAsLnEy1xQKF25u/cRJsy4g5p
 fGX7y+WxmUt7fCaJ7aLZLR4FidYUHgoa9FGM/Bkil2vqEPZyZMG3FbTAYhBYgYRP1ujL
 JT76KA42T2YyIskDSY12XUxWCXd48LOxFvSdIVv/kznIAavyRDSEaHtueT6eaqZUceDI
 YmRhukABJy8esrRV5ZWIY3fqTiUM+1lI4MrpjTjyMSP/6ksrTY21DcfmGHFcaI85mIBa
 1hRw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.143.73 with SMTP id sc9mr34373573igb.29.1411590958760;
 Wed, 24 Sep 2014 13:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.165.73 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 13:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 16:35:58 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: VFP9onZLDrsLiWs1xsY_LkZff9o
Message-ID: <CAHzLAVGcGPQP3NvaSpe6+idLdEWM4hrQyPwP6YVPvOO-J823Fw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Poudriere Build of pkg_* repos?
From: Rick Miller <vmiller@hostileadmin.com>
To: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 20:35:59 -0000

Hi all,

Does the EOL of legacy pkg_* tools in FreeBSD Ports affect Poudriere's
ability to build legacy package repos?

Poudriere was able to build a legacy pkg_* repo from a snapshot of Ports
from around the time releng/10.0 received the patch for -p7, but it failed
to build a legacy repo from a snapshot taken today and instead built a
pkg(8) repo despite make.conf having WITHOUT_PKGNG=yes.

Aside:  Actually, it seemed to ignore the make.conf altogether as it
contains PERL_VERSION=5.14.4 and built 5.16 instead.

Provided this is the case, what suggestions are there for patching today's
bash remote execution vulnerability[1] in a version of Ports that can be
built into a legacy repo?

[1] http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q3/650

-- 
Take care
Rick Miller