From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 4 20:36:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A6916A407 for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2007 20:36:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from raven.customer.vol.cz (raven.customer.vol.cz [195.250.144.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27C713C455 for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2007 20:36:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.23] (r3b159.net.upc.cz [213.220.193.159]) (authenticated bits=0) by raven.customer.vol.cz (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l34KamEA071966 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 22:36:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) From: Pav Lucistnik To: NIIMI Satoshi In-Reply-To: <4612DAC9.1090505@sa2c.net> References: <20070403051207.GW3330@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> <4612DAC9.1090505@sa2c.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-qt/kLXyiqD7jvKmM9HwS" Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 22:36:48 +0200 Message-Id: <1175719008.91901.5.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.0 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Score: -2.307 () AWL,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 195.250.144.108 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: raven.customer.vol.cz; Sender-ip: 213.220.193.159; Sender-helo: [192.168.0.23]; ) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: OPTIONS improvement X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:36:55 -0000 --=-qt/kLXyiqD7jvKmM9HwS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable NIIMI Satoshi p=ED=B9e v st 04. 04. 2007 v 07:52 +0900: > On 2007/04/03 14:12, Rong-En Fan wrote: > > After pav@'s commit to bsd.port.mk, now you can test WITH/WITHOUT > > freely with OPTIONS. >=20 > I filed a PR ports/78343 with similar patch, but the PR was rejected. > Why the policy has been changed? Guess we're two years smarter now. People kept doing it wrong way even when we repeatedly told them how to do it. In the end, it's probably easier to fix the infrastructure :) Plus, the currently committed patch was address different problem. The fix for your PR went as kind of a side effect. --=20 Pav Lucistnik Traffic collapse starts at rumors of snow in Nice (french riviera) according to some of my friends :) -- Will at #angband --=-qt/kLXyiqD7jvKmM9HwS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBGFAxcntdYP8FOsoIRAggeAKCh1eIBwcvXf3qH4B0AOTId+dp54ACcCiOD MBEwuhq8ShjoQG6R7UBN9w4= =edtK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-qt/kLXyiqD7jvKmM9HwS--