Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 17:36:00 +0000 (UTC) From: Csaba Henk <csaba-ml@creo.hu> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove NTFS kernel support Message-ID: <slrnfqrp0m.i6j.csaba-ml@beastie.creo.hu> References: <3bbf2fe10802061700p253e68b8s704deb3e5e4ad086@mail.gmail.com> <20080207071314.GO99258@elvis.mu.org> <47AABEEF.7020807@FreeBSD.org> <7ad7ddd90802070135y6eeaded6lcffc6b5751ee5c40@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2008-02-07, Ulrich Spoerlein <uspoerlein@gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 7, 2008 9:18 AM, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote: >> Alfred Perlstein wrote: >> >> > Maybe a nicer way of saying/asking would be to ask: >> > >> > Is the FUSE replacement going to be tested to the point where it's >> > better than then current NTFS code? >> >> Given that the current NTFS code in the base panics within minutes of >> any kind of serious access, and has the ability to take the other >> filesystems down with it (including UFS2) that won't be hard. > > Please keep in mind, that the current FUSE port to FreeBSD is lagging > behind and I can reproducibly panic -CURRENT using fuse-ntfs, too. Hey, I'm catching up with it. Regarding your panic: we have discussed it: I could not reproduce it and you did not succeed to give me enough information (no offense here, it's not always easy...). I suggest you to file a PR, maybe others can reproduce it. Csaba
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?slrnfqrp0m.i6j.csaba-ml>