From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Feb 22 16:13:14 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id QAA10931 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 22 Feb 1995 16:13:14 -0800 Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA10924; Wed, 22 Feb 1995 16:13:04 -0800 Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id RAA16181; Wed, 22 Feb 1995 17:16:20 -0700 Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 17:16:20 -0700 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199502230016.RAA16181@trout.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" "Re: XFree86 probs? This the right place?" (Feb 22, 4:04pm) X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92) To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , hasty@netcom.com Subject: Re: XFree86 probs? This the right place? Cc: dsherwin@cts.com (Daniel Sherwin), hackers@FreeBSD.org Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > > If I have a problem with a newly installed SNAP BSD version and > > > > my X-Windows, is this the right place to ask for help, or > > > > should I direct it to a XFree list? > > > > What is your problem? > > > > Also questions relating to Xfree should be directed to the > > XFree86 mailing list. > Huh? I presume you're a good friend of Dan's or something, and this > entirely ad-hominem attack on him has some greater significance that Umm, I think the 'attack-wars' going on are rubbing off. I didn't take this an atttack at all, but a 'Questions *should* be directed to XFree's mailing list, but I'd like to know that the problem is anyway' and not a 'GET A LIFE YOU LOSER, XFREE PROBLEMS DON'T BELONG HERE.' Sheesh, we are starting to have to be PC (politically correct) around here to avoid being mis-interpreted. Nate