From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 10:39:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7475B16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:39:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA1243D5F for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:39:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AD4A75125A; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:39:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:39:20 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Peter Jeremy Message-ID: <20050227103919.GA18033@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050226071308.GN57256@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <20050227032315.GA96334@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <20050227032829.GA75730@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050227102404.GB96334@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050227102404.GB96334@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Excessive delays due to syncer kthread X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:39:22 -0000 --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 09:24:04PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Sat, 2005-Feb-26 19:28:29 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >I don't think there are known problems with use of PREEMPTION on > >RELENG_5. >=20 > Thanks for that. How about RELENG_5_3? Do I need to move to > -STABLE (and traditionally, this point of the release cycle is not > a good time to be running -STABLE). I think RELENG_5_3 is good too. I think there were some problems with PREEMPTION during the 5.3 release cycle, but they were all fixed before release. Kris --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCIaNXWry0BWjoQKURAiErAJkBxiTjnIIqxqYsUmbBQqWa4gKRTACfaLYP joLAswAhK0uoWNKQs91lEvE= =bmZ5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO--