Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:21:07 +0100
From:      Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
To:        Rafa <rafart@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: About FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <20041018122107.GA26921@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <7b0f2ddd0410180511d79304a@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <7b0f2ddd0410180511d79304a@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 10:11:40AM -0200, Rafa wrote:

> I would like to know if all the functions from UNIX are the same from
> the FreeBSD, because I must do a homework to my school and I didn't
> find any FreeBSD book!

FreeBSD is unix and FreeBSD complies with the Single Unix
Specification[1] and other standards like POSIX, so basically yes.  If
theres any difference between the standards spec and the FreeBSD
implementation, it's generally because the FreeBSD implementation is a
superset of what's required.

	Cheers

	Matthew

[1] Informally, because actually getting the OS tested costs money.
That's why FreeBSD is unix, but not Unix(TM).

--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.                       26 The Paddocks
                                                      Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey         Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614                                  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK

--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBc7UziD657aJF7eIRAqO5AKC14cwBMjF/AuEk5YK03Ql7AcGDFgCfQJ0T
QND3CCs2QeGdD3ILNDmVqrU=
=qIch
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041018122107.GA26921>