From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 8 16:23:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org (saarinen.org [203.79.82.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54CA737B423 for ; Tue, 8 May 2001 16:23:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from juha@saarinen.org) Received: from dendennis.saarinen.org ([192.168.1.2] helo=dendennis) by vimfuego.saarinen.org with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hack)) id 14xGpL-00044z-00; Wed, 09 May 2001 11:23:35 +1200 From: "Juha Saarinen" To: Cc: , , , Subject: RE: CFLAGS Optimization Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 11:23:07 +1200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 In-Reply-To: <200105082305.QAA04771@freeway.dcfinc.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :: Perhaps you'd be more comfortable if we changed the documentation to :: remove all references to any -O switch with a number attached? Dunno. In my experience, any -O switch with a number attached creates problems when compiling the kernel/userland on FreeBSD, so it seems pointless to have those options. OTOH Jordan pointed out that there are some instances for which the optflags can be useful. I don't know why the optflags produce broken code on FreeBSD, but not with Linux. Aren't we sick of this thread yet? -- Juha To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message