Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:01:37 -0800 From: "Kip Macy" <kip.macy@gmail.com> To: "Walter Vaughan" <wvaughan@steelerubber.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it possible to debug an AMD kernel on Intel Message-ID: <b1fa29170711261501o544290aexb20432576d74ef4d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <474B4864.6010109@steelerubber.com> References: <m2fxyu5tsy.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <474983F1.3030700@pbxpress.com> <m2ve7p35iy.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <b1fa29170711252232yb798d46w9aa74f55954250f5@mail.gmail.com> <20071126180500.GB79600@dragon.NUXI.org> <b1fa29170711261058s5d5e1631y27ae8486e0707f34@mail.gmail.com> <474B4864.6010109@steelerubber.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 26, 2007 2:27 PM, Walter Vaughan <wvaughan@steelerubber.com> wrote: > Kip Macy wrote: > > >but we are in a small minority in using AMD instead of x86_64 or > >64-bit intel. > > > Hum, those Ubuntu people who are building vmware images are minority as well > http://isv-image.ubuntu.com/vmware/ > and their daily build farm team too... > http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/ > Interesting. Thanks for the data point. The fact that amd64.org appears to be a cname for x86-64.org and all the links on amd64.org point to x86-64.org pretty much sums up my point of view. It doesn't really matter that much at the end of the day. -Kip
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b1fa29170711261501o544290aexb20432576d74ef4d>