From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 2 05:14:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E32242B1; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 05:14:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ns.kevlo.org (220-135-115-6.HINET-IP.hinet.net [220.135.115.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ns.kevlo.org", Issuer "ns.kevlo.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84618923; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 05:14:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from srg.kevlo.org (220-135-115-6.HINET-IP.hinet.net [220.135.115.6]) by ns.kevlo.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s325Dt4i042936 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Apr 2014 13:13:56 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from kevlo@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <533B9C9C.3050504@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 13:14:04 +0800 From: Kevin Lo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: UDP Lite support References: <201403261122.43541.jhb@freebsd.org> <5333F020.8000200@FreeBSD.org> <201403271221.29864.jhb@freebsd.org> <533A2285.2030705@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Joe Nosay , Brooks Davis , freebsd-current , Xin LI X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 05:14:32 -0000 On 2014/04/02 04:53, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi! Hi Adrian, > > On 31 March 2014 19:20, Kevin Lo wrote: > > >> Thank you John. glebius@ suggests we don't need to have two absolutely >> equal uma zones since most systems don't run UDP-Lite. >> If practice shows that a differentiation at zone level between UDP and >> UDP-Lite PCBs is important, then it could be done later. >> >> Following up with a fourth version of the udp-lite patch. >> http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/udplite.diff >> >> On top of the previous versions, this: >> - removes a uma zone for udp-lite >> - udp_common_ctlinput() belongs under #ifdef INET >> - removes sysctl nodes for udp-lite. >> - bumps version and adds my copyright. > I've just briefly review this. > > I recommend turning the places where you do this: > > + pcbinfo = (pr == IPPROTO_UDP) ? &V_udbinfo : &V_ulitecbinfo; > > .. into some inline function which returns the correct pcbinfo based > on what 'pr' is. > > That way if someone wants to add another derivative UDP handler they > won't have to go and change those conditionals to yet another set of > nested conditionals. > > Same for: > > + pcblist = (pr == IPPROTO_UDP) ? &V_udb : &V_ulitecb; > > Other than that, it looks good. Thanks for the review. I added two inline functions get_inpcbinfo() and get_pcblist() which return the correct pcbinfo and pcblist respectively. The current version of the patch is in the same location, thanks. > > > -a Kevin