From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 30 09:24:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA07147 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Wed, 30 Dec 1998 09:24:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from drmemory.fnal.gov (drmemory.fnal.gov [131.225.105.170]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA07134 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 1998 09:24:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rneswold@drmemory.fnal.gov) Received: (from rneswold@localhost) by drmemory.fnal.gov (8.8.8/8.8.6) id LAA00994 for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Dec 1998 11:23:33 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 11:23:28 -0600 From: "Richard M. Neswold" To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: POVRAY port... Message-ID: <19981230112328.A476@drmemory.fnal.gov> Reply-To: rneswold@mcs.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i X-PGP-RSAfprint: 0A C8 A5 76 DF 8E E1 B3 F3 97 BE 73 DA CD 4B C9 X-PGP-RSAkey: ftp://ftp.mcs.net/mcsnet.users/rneswold/pub.key X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2.8-STABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org So the POVRAY port is marked as broken due to the checksum. So what is so hard about building a new checksum? Is there something *really* broken in the port? Or will a 'make makesum' fix it? -- Rich ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rich Neswold | PGP: 0A C8 A5 76 DF 8E E1 B3 rneswold@mcs.net | F3 97 BE 73 DA CD 4B C9 http://www.mcs.net/~rneswold | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message