From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jul 23 15:44:27 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA21088 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 23 Jul 1996 15:44:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from riverside.mr.net (root@Riverside.MR.Net [137.192.2.5]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA21076 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 1996 15:44:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from galileo.mr.net by riverside.mr.net (8.7.5/SMI-4.1.R931202) id RAA08412; Tue, 23 Jul 1996 17:44:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from black@localhost) by galileo.mr.net (8.7.2/8.7.2) id RAA23534; Tue, 23 Jul 1996 17:44:15 -0500 (CDT) From: Ben Black Message-Id: <199607232244.RAA23534@galileo.mr.net> Subject: Re: Linux vs. freebsd To: mwhite+@CMU.EDU (Matthew Jason White) Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 17:44:14 -0500 (CDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freefall.freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Matthew Jason White" at Jul 23, 96 05:50:27 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME7a] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Excerpts from internet.computing.freebsd-questions: 23-Jul-96 Re: Linux > vs. freebsd by Stephen Hovey@buffnet.ne > > Also Im not sure linux has the ip aliasing you need for multiple domains > > for web. > > It does, although I think the Linux people call it 'IP Masquerading' or > somesuch. I would tend to agree that FreeBSD is a better choice for > server applications, hands down...but then there's a reason why I'm > subscribed to this list. > > > -Matt > masquerading is entireley different. aliasing is aliasing and that is what it called in linux as well. Ben