From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 10 19:45:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7076737B401; Sat, 10 May 2003 19:45:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thalia.otenet.gr (mailsrv.otenet.gr [195.170.0.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4963443FDD; Sat, 10 May 2003 19:45:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-a128.otenet.gr [212.205.215.128]) by thalia.otenet.gr (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4B2jSRU023555; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:45:28 +0300 (EEST) Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4B2jRmi009269; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:45:27 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4B2jRA4009268; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:45:27 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 05:45:27 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20030511024527.GA9150@gothmog.gr> References: <200305110053.h4B0rGd9004467@gothmog.gr> <20030511010700.GA4585@gothmog.gr> <20030511020519.GB13346@sixshooter.v6.thrupoint.net> <20030511021605.GB8548@gothmog.gr> <20030510193250.C665@znfgre.qbhto.arg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030510193250.C665@znfgre.qbhto.arg> cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/52041: testing new mdoc-bug class X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 02:45:32 -0000 On 2003-05-10 19:33, Doug Barton wrote: > On Sun, 11 May 2003, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > I'm adding this class to separate bug reports of the docs/ category to > > two classes. Those that affect manpages (or other parts of the src/ > > tree) and those that affect doc/*. > > That sounds like a reasonable goal, but wouldn't a category name like > doc-src (or src-doc) make more sense? There is more documentation in the > tree than just mdoc. I can change it to doc-src or src-doc-bug very easily. The second will fit nicely among the existing classes but is probably too large to type manually. I don't really mind if the name is doc-src, src-doc, src-doc-bug or doc-src-bug. If the extra verbosity isn't too much I'd prefer the last one: doc-src-bug.