From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Nov 30 23:49:04 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA16435
          for ports-outgoing; Sun, 30 Nov 1997 23:49:04 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca34-12.ix.netcom.com [207.93.143.140])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA16422
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 30 Nov 1997 23:48:59 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.8/8.6.9) id XAA19022; Sun, 30 Nov 1997 23:47:01 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 1997 23:47:01 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199712010747.XAA19022@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: Studded@dal.net
CC: ports@freebsd.org, bde@zeta.org.au
In-reply-to: <3481E63F.B3250EE4@dal.net> (message from Studded on Sun, 30 Nov 1997 14:18:39 -0800)
Subject: Re: Question/suggestion re pine port
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * so I have a question and a suggestion. First off, I'm curious as to why
 * the patches we supply build -g versions of the binaries.  Not a big
 * deal, just wondering. :) I also have a suggestion regarding installing

Really?  It says "-O2 -pipe" here.  Maybe you should define CFLAGS in
/etc/make.conf.

Speaking of which, why is it that we ship the system with CFLAGS in
/etc/make.conf commented out?  Shouldn't hurt to have a reasonable
default, no?  (Note CC: line. :)

Satoshi