From owner-freebsd-current Fri Apr 30 11:30:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7669F15187 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 1999 11:30:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) id LAA04144; Fri, 30 Apr 1999 11:28:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) From: Steve Kargl Message-Id: <199904301828.LAA04144@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Subject: Re: ep0 *UTP* In-Reply-To: from Dag-Erling Smorgrav at "Apr 30, 1999 07:23:51 pm" To: des@flood.ping.uio.no (Dag-Erling Smorgrav) Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 11:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Cc: garbanzo@hooked.net (Alex Zepeda), jbryant@unix.tfs.net (Jim Bryant), freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Alex Zepeda writes: > > On Wed, 28 Apr 1999, Jim Bryant wrote: > > > > Well, I'd chalk it up to buggy 3com h/w myself. Alas I'm still getting: > > > > ep0 XXX: driver didn't set ifq_maxlen > > > I still get that one too. Driver problem? > > I'm guessing so. I wonder if this is the cause of some odd network > > behavior I'm getting.. > > Anybody using a 3c509 and expecting it to work reliably should be > taken out and shot in the back of the head. > I thought I sent this before, but I can't find in the GNAT database. --- if_ep.c.orig Fri Apr 30 11:22:36 1999 +++ if_ep.c Fri Apr 30 11:24:15 1999 @@ -621,6 +621,7 @@ ifp->if_start = epstart; ifp->if_ioctl = epioctl; ifp->if_watchdog = epwatchdog; + ifp->if_snd.ifq_maxlen = IFQ_MAXLEN; if (!attached) { if_attach(ifp); -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message