From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 21 14:21:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF80616A41F for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:21:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jon.otterholm@ide.resurscentrum.se) Received: from mail1.cil.se (mail1.cil.se [217.197.56.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABAAC43D7C for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:21:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jon.otterholm@ide.resurscentrum.se) Received: from 192.168.2.10 ([192.168.2.10]) by edusrv05.edu.irc.local ([192.168.44.14]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:21:33 +0000 Received: from by mail1.cil.se; 21 Nov 2005 15:21:33 +0100 From: Jon Otterholm To: Brian Candler In-Reply-To: <20051121130046.GA22502@uk.tiscali.com> References: <20051110124903.GB67086@uk.tiscali.com> <1131629107.878.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051117135738.GH5197@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <1132239963.819.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051117152357.GA8209@uk.tiscali.com> <1132242723.819.45.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051117162748.GA8417@uk.tiscali.com> <20051117173535.GF97528@gremlin.foo.is> <20051121112856.GB21985@uk.tiscali.com> <1132577145.1411.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051121130046.GA22502@uk.tiscali.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:21:33 +0100 Message-Id: <1132582893.1411.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: arp-proxy X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:21:36 -0000 I think they do that when using standard 802.1Q, but for some reason theey don't when running QinQ... /Jon On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 13:00 +0000, Brian Candler wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 01:45:44PM +0100, Jon Otterholm wrote: > > The reason why I have to proxy-arp mac between VLANs is that one mac > > cannot end up mapped to more than one port in the switches FDB. If they > > do - we get something called "host-flapping" on IOS-language. > > Or put it another way - Cisco haven't properly virtualised their VLANs so > that they have separate forwarding tables.