From owner-freebsd-questions Sun May 26 15:17:12 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA25636 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 26 May 1996 15:17:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from seabass.progroup.com (catfish.progroup.com [206.24.122.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA25605 for ; Sun, 26 May 1996 15:17:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from craig@localhost) by seabass.progroup.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id PAA26542 for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 May 1996 15:18:05 -0700 Message-Id: <199605262218.PAA26542@seabass.progroup.com> Subject: Re: xterm never sleeps... To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 26 May 1996 15:18:05 -0700 (PDT) From: "Craig Shaver" In-Reply-To: from "John Fieber" at May 26, 96 02:05:51 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25 ME8b] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > I just `upgraded' from XFree86 3.1.2 to 3.1.2E. Now `idle' xterm > process sit chewing up cpu time. A couple xterms will keep the > load average around 1 on an otherwise completely idle system. Just did the same thing this weekend. When I saw your mail I ran top and saw the same thing. Soooooo, I still had the 312d bin tgz sitting around and fetched the xterm from it. My load avg is back to normal and the xterms seem to have quieted down. > > I'm running the May 1st FreeBSD-2.2 snapshot. Has anyone else > noticed this? 2.1-R > > -john > > == jfieber@indiana.edu =========================================== > == http://fallout.campusview.indiana.edu/~jfieber ================ > > -- Craig Shaver (craig@progroup.com) (415)390-0654 Productivity Group POB 60458 Sunnyvale, CA 94088