Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 10:09:25 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251117] [NEW PORT] www/palemoon: Open-source web browser Message-ID: <bug-251117-7788-oAAqoErsmt@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-251117-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-251117-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251117 --- Comment #106 from Olivier Certner <olivier.freebsd@free.fr> --- (In reply to Kostas Oikonomou from comment #98) Hi Kostas, > He seems apologetic for Tobin's behavior. I suggest you read my previous comment first. Then, you'll understand why it will take a lot more than a small, single apology, for me to believe in what Moonchild is claiming. > Is that an indication that maybe support for FreeBSD won't be removed? I don't know, and Moonchild seems to change his mind a lot. In any case, it= 's not my concern anymore. I wish good luck to anybody that would try to maintain such a port despite upstream's behavior. I'm not going to update the FreeBSD port patch anymore, 29.4.6 is the last = from me. With luck, you can change the version and the distfile checksum inside the patch and it may work, were Moonchild to release another version in the 29.= 4.x series (I don't know what his plans are; I don't think he said anything with regards to when the 30.x series will be ready, even on the forums; and of course nothing on whether FreeBSD-specific code will be dropped there, desp= ite hinting to me that keeping it was so much annoying). Regards. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-251117-7788-oAAqoErsmt>