Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:47:13 +0200 From: Thierry Thomas <thierry@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-fortran@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why fortran mailing list? Message-ID: <20130710084713.GA73590@graf.pompo.net> In-Reply-To: <201307100759.r6A7xqsK098965@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20130709231808.GA92444@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <201307100759.r6A7xqsK098965@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le mer 10 jul 13 à 9:59:52 +0200, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bris.ac.uk> écrivait : > That's not my experience. > For example french/aster, a major FE suite, > fails on both amd64 and ia64: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/176326 > > As far as I know it fails on places other than fortran, > but it is largely "a fortran port". Yes Code_Aster has problems, but PR ports/176328 is caused by another problem located in metis-edf (a patch has been provided, and we are waiting for the maintainer to commit it). Other problems are caused by a mismatch between legacy code and recent compilers. E.g.: http://www.code-aster.org/forum2/viewtopic.php?id=16215 http://www.code-aster.org/forum2/viewtopic.php?id=16194 but they are not specific to FreeBSD, and the newer releases of Code_Aster (unstable ATM) have fixed them. Regards, -- Th. Thomas.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130710084713.GA73590>