From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec 16 22:26:18 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9FC616A420
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 22:26:18 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: from relay00.pair.com (relay00.pair.com [209.68.5.9])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A866443D78
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 22:26:00 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: (qmail 6655 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2005 22:25:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (unknown)
	by unknown with SMTP; 16 Dec 2005 22:25:54 -0000
X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:25:53 -0600 (CST)
From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
To: Alan Amesbury <amesbury@umn.edu>
In-Reply-To: <43A325DC.306@umn.edu>
Message-ID: <20051216162507.O937@odysseus.silby.com>
References: <43A325DC.306@umn.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 6-STABLE:  HZ>1000, RFC1323 non-compliance, and PF
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 22:26:19 -0000


On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Alan Amesbury wrote:

> Because we have several systems equipped with em(4)-compatible cards
> that are intended to accept traffic at gigabit speeds, I've configured
> them with HZ=2000, per the notes above.  However, 6-STABLE has also
> included some newer pf(4) code, which is fundamentally incompatible with
> a HZ setting this high.  I did some digging and eventually came up with
> this PR:
>
>    http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/61404

I'll throw it on my to-do list, hopefully I'll get to it over the next few 
weeks.

I'm going to fix it a bit differently than that patch does, though.

Mike "Silby" Silbersack